Skip to content

On no budget

The cheapest way to start

Most advice assumes a budget. The free version is short, dull and works better than most retainers.

The short answer

The cheapest start is a fixed list of twenty buyer questions, run by hand across the assistants once a month and logged in a spreadsheet, plus a rewrite of your five most commercial pages so each opens with a complete answer. It costs time only, and it is the first move a paid engagement would make.

What ranked on 23 September 2026: Every first-page result proposed a tool or a service. The free method is published nowhere prominent, which is unsurprising given who does the publishing.

Last reviewed · 3 sources

What free actually gets you

The unpaid version covers measurement and most on-site work. It does not cover scale.

  • Manual sampling gives a usable signal for an hour a month if the questions never change
  • Rewriting for extraction needs judgement, and you know your subject
  • Correcting directory and review descriptions is free and often the best change
  • It will not cover dozens of markets or continuous monitoring
  • Pay when the manual work stops fitting, not when a vendor says so

Claim and reality

Things that sound right and are not.

Flip a card for what is actually true.

  • Claim

    Free means low value.

  • Claim

    We will start once we have budget approval.

  • Claim

    A free tool tier is enough.

Where to start

In order. Tick as you go, or copy the list.

0 of 5 done

0%

Questions

Asked most.

How long does the free version take?

Around a day to set up the prompt set and rewrite five pages, then an hour a month to sample.

When should we start paying for something?

When sampling outgrows an hour, you need more markets than one person can track, or the diagnosis is clear and nobody has time to act.

Does this work for a brand nobody has heard of?

The on-site half does, at once. Being recommended depends on others describing you, which is slower.

Evidence, labelled

What is confirmed, what is reported, what is a hunch.

Each claim is labelled and sourced. Google rows speak only for Google.

Last reviewed · 3 sources

Confirmed
Stated in the platform's own documentation or measured in published data.
Reported
Third-party study or vendor data. Method and conflicts noted.
Hypothesis
Plausible and common advice. No controlled public evidence.
  • Monthly manual sampling gives a usable baseline.

    Reported

    Lists differ run to run, so judge appearance over repeated runs. The study used 60 to 100 runs per prompt. Twenty prompts monthly is direction, not proof.

    SparkToro study, via SEJ (opens in a new tab)

  • First-party AI reports are free to read.

    Confirmed

    Search Console shows AI impressions for every site. Bing shows citations and sample grounding queries.

    Google, AI performance reports (opens in a new tab) source 1Bing, AI Performance (opens in a new tab) source 2

  • Rewriting five pages answer-first lifts citations.

    Hypothesis

    Common advice and cheap to test. I found no controlled public test, so compare before and after on your own prompts.

    No public source

Go deeper

Next step

Want this applied to your own site?

Send me your site and what you have tried. I will say which step comes first for you and which you can skip.

Send me your siteWritten reply within 24 hours.

Just have a question?

Email and one sentence. No call, no form to fill.